 | Plaintiff, V. Case No. Cf-2003-5243 Judge Caroline Wall anthony kirby Motion to suppress evidence derived from the illegal seizure of the defendant’s attorney-client communication 38.1 Kb.  1 | read |
 | Myth vs. Fact Setting the Record Straight on Chairman Pai’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order myth Fact: The Internet was free and open before the Obama Administration’s 2015 heavy-handed Title II internet regulations, and it will be free and open after they are repealed 34.14 Kb. 1 | read |
| The Truth About The United States Of America A people's History of the United States 1492—Present Howard Zinn HarperPerennial 41.93 Kb. 1 | read |
| In the supreme court of namibia Art 12(1)(a) of the Constitution. The adjudication of this issue calls for an analysis of the purpose and place of urgent interlocutory interdicts in our law of legal practice and procedure 142.11 Kb. 2 | read |
| Ex ante regulation of computer search and seizure Fourth Amendment and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The affidavit establishes probable cause, the warrant particularly describes the items to be seized 66.93 Kb. 1 | read |
| Stan Grant’s naidoc address Wednesday 6 July 2016 Thank you very much, thank you all for coming along. It’s great to see a crowd here. It must be cold outside, it’s warm in here, that must be why you’ve all turned up 35.63 Kb. 1 | read |
| Lgbtq rights in india and usa : a comparative analysis Act on Registered Partnership. But the law fell short of calling these same sex unions as “marriages” and couples could not get married in the Danish state church or adopt a child. Even so 366.29 Kb. 1 | read |
| Forensic Anthropology Office hours: Monday (6-8pm), Tuesday (1-2pm & 5: 30-7pm), Wednesday (9-10am), Thursday (1: 30-2: 30pm), and by appointment 101.5 Kb. 13 | read |
| Give Black Americans 5/3 of a weighed vote as reparations Doing the plan solves representation 11.01 Kb. 1 | read |
| The paper should be 1500 words Include subheadings Massachusetts et al V. Environmental protection agency et al. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit no. 05–1120 16.46 Kb. 1 | read |